
i don't blame the present situation, but the pattern of overclassi
ficaion that's occurred since 1947.
it's instructive to run searches on it. two of the better places it's discussed are the Secrecy Blog of the Federation of American Scientists (FAS) and Unredacted, part of the National Security Archive.
http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/
http://nsarchive.wordpress.com/
any social actions which have endured for a period of time, including bureaucratic actions, possess a 'social inertia'. one can make promises to 'change course' all one wants, but it remains true that change only takes place incrementally.
while a large group can change course with speed, as in our immediate public response to 911, small groups or individuals find it more difficult. their efforts must be continuous and spread out over far longer periods of time.
this is one of the reasons the President's 'openness' policy is a goal which will go beyond his tenure, if not removed by a subsequent Republican administration.
for that matter, much material has been declassified, and it was immediately afterwards deemed 'protected unclassified material', and thus withheld from the public again.
in other words, it became classified material which never reached the public, because it became a new type of classified material. . .much like Bush's term 'enemy combatants', which had never existed before and is not a part of international law.
and bureaucratic inertia, or 'red tape', is one of the most difficult types of social inertia to slow, stop, or alter.
About Wikileaks
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost
No comments:
Post a Comment